StackedHR combines agentic AI evaluation with human expertise to revolutionize project-based interviews, ensuring you find the perfect candidate every time.
%
Report stronger candidates
x
Faster hiring process
%
Reduction in hiring bias
We help teams around the world create and run project based interviews at scale to unearth the best possible candidate for the job.
Easily create comprehensive project-based interviews with customizable templates, evaluation rubrics, and deadlines. Set up fair and consistent assessments for all candidates.
Customize your interview structure
Our revolutionary process combines peer review with AI assistance to accurately stack rank the strongest candidates, providing a comprehensive and balanced assessment of skills and potential.
Identify top talent within days, not weeks. Our efficient system handles hundreds to thousands of applicants, saving you valuable time and resources.
Ensure fair evaluations with our double-blind, anonymized review process. Every candidate is judged solely on their skills and project performance, eliminating unconscious biases.
Minimize costly hiring mistakes by consistently identifying top-tier talent. Our system ensures you select the best candidates, reducing turnover and training costs while maximizing your return on investment in human capital.
No matter what industry you're in, StackedHR can help. Explore how businesses or institutions like yours have benefited.
Our take-home case studies are now evaluated more thoroughly and fairly using StackedHR. We've seen a 40% reduction in time-to-hire while maintaining our high standards. The platform's ability to handle complex, multi-faceted project submissions is impressive.
We use average yearly salaries based on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. For a Software Engineer, the typical salary is $120,000 per year.
This is how many new people you plan to hire each month. More hires increase costs but also massively increases savings with StackedHR. The default is set to 4 hires per month for a growing agency scenario.
This is how long it usually takes to hire someone. According to SHRM, the average time-to-fill a position is 42 days. Longer hiring times increase the cost of unfilled positions. We assume a daily cost of $328.77 based on the selected position's salary for each open position.
This is how many people you usually interview before hiring one person. More candidates mean more time spent on interviews, increasing hiring costs. We assume 1 hour per candidate at $57.69/hour, plus 6 hours for job descriptions and project creation per hire. The average is set to 25 candidates based on industry data.
This is the likelihood that a hire will be unsuccessful and need to be replaced. Bad hires typically cost about 40% of annual salary in replacement costs, lost productivity, and training. Industry average is around 20%. StackedHR's evaluation system helps reduce this risk by 50%.
Choose to see costs and savings by month or by year to understand both short-term and long-term impacts.
Estimated savings with StackedHR:
Based on $328.77/day for 42 days per hire, 4 hires/month.
Includes 25 interviews at $57.69/hour, plus 6 hours for job descriptions and project creation, 4 hires/month.
20% probability of bad hire at 40% of salary cost ($48,000) per bad hire.
Monthly subscription cost for a stereotypical mid-sized agency.
20% reduction in hiring time to 34 days.
40% reduction to 15 candidates interviewed.
50% reduction in bad hire probability to 10% through better evaluation.
Your Savings: $31,297 per month
StackedHR optimizes your hiring process, reducing time-to-hire, interview load, and the risk of bad hires. This translates to significant savings on unfilled positions, interviewing time, and potential turnover costs.
Note: These projections are based on industry averages and the most conservative estimates of StackedHR performance data. Actual savings may vary based on your specific circumstances and implementation. The StackedHR cost is calculated at $1950 per month for a stereotypical early to mid-sized agency.